Skip to main content
PatentCliff

Updated April 2026 · USPTO PatentsView

CPC G11

Information Storage Patent Landscape

243 patents tracked across 4 companies in CPC G11.

The Information Storage technology class (CPC G11) covers 243 U.S. patents tracked here, held across 4 companies. Filing activity, top patent holders, and recent grants below all come directly from USPTO records.

Patent landscape for Information Storage technology (CPC class G11). Covers innovations in information storage from leading companies worldwide.

Information Storage at a Glance

243 patents under Information Storage make this a focused mid-tier technology class. Mid-tier classes often have a clear top-three of corporate patent holders, with the long tail filled by specialist firms and university tech-transfer offices.

IBM (108 patents, grade B), Microsoft (73, grade C), and Nvidia (48, grade D) hold the top three positions in Information Storage. The grade column reflects each company's overall Patent Strength Score across its full portfolio, not just patents in this technology class.

Patent Activity by Year

2013
6
2014
4
2015
9
2016
7
2017
12
2018
8
2019
22
2020
9
2021
12
2022
17
2023
17
2024
12
2025
13
2026
15
2027
11
2028
5

Filing activity in Information Storage has accelerated, with the most recent five years averaging about 11 new patents per year — roughly 32% above the earlier window. Acceleration often correlates with a technology shift attracting fresh corporate R&D, and it tends to push expiration cliffs further out as new filings replace older ones.

Recent Patents in Information Storage

Patent #TitleAssigneeGrantedExpiresClaimsStatus
10000064Data storage system with efficient graphene architectureIBMAug 3, 2028Sep 11, 20444218.4y left
10000088Apparatus for scalable data encoding in nano-scale systemsIBMJun 6, 2028Jun 21, 20442818.2y left
10000461Computer-implemented method for dynamic quantum optimizationMicrosoftApr 1, 2028Jan 13, 20442017.8y left
10000397Apparatus for distributed computational operations in CMOS environmentsMicrosoftFeb 8, 2028Oct 18, 20442418.5y left
10000111Computer-implemented method for integrated RF optimizationIBMJan 18, 2028Mar 1, 20441917.9y left
10000419Method for optimized wireless communication using 5GMicrosoftDec 12, 2027Feb 3, 20434916.8y left
10000453Method for integrated digital information retrievalMicrosoftNov 26, 2027Jul 16, 20442018.3y left
10000457Data storage system with integrated neural architectureMicrosoftNov 20, 2027Aug 4, 2044718.3y left
10000097System for advanced signal transmission in graphene networksIBMOct 26, 2027Jan 9, 20442017.8y left
10000127Apparatus for low-latency data encoding in RF systemsIBMOct 6, 2027Feb 19, 20431316.9y left
10000534Data storage system with optimized blockchain architectureIntelAug 7, 2027May 26, 2044818.1y left
10000465System for adaptive neural network processing with lidarMicrosoftAug 5, 2027Jun 10, 20441618.2y left
10000546Data storage system with modular 5G architectureIntelFeb 21, 2027May 9, 20431217.1y left
10000371Computer-implemented method for scalable digital optimizationMicrosoftFeb 15, 2027Jun 9, 20433617.2y left
10000469Data storage system with low-latency AI-driven architectureMicrosoftJan 11, 2027Aug 22, 20442518.4y left
10000446Method for dynamic RF information retrievalMicrosoftJan 5, 2027Jun 27, 2044618.2y left
10000452Method for optimized nano-scale information retrievalMicrosoftDec 13, 2026Dec 11, 20432917.7y left
10000076Method for advanced analog information retrievalIBMDec 3, 2026Oct 17, 20433217.5y left
10000412Apparatus for modular data encoding in MEMS systemsMicrosoftNov 16, 2026Jun 27, 20422516.2y left
10000087System for enhanced signal transmission in digital networksIBMOct 8, 2026Mar 22, 20444018.0y left

What Expirations Mean for Information Storage

As patents in Information Storage expire, the underlying methods and apparatuses enter the public domain. Competitors gain freedom to operate without licensing the original claims, and downstream products incorporating the formerly protected technology can ship without a royalty stack. This is the ground-truth mechanism that drives generic-drug economics and the broader competitive dynamics in semiconductor process generations and consumer electronics platforms.

For pharmaceutical and biotech CPC classes, drug-specific exclusivities tracked in the FDA Orange Book can delay generic entry past patent expiration. For non-drug technology classes, expiration is a cleaner trigger — competitors generally gain freedom-to-operate immediately. Either way, the underlying expiration math comes from USPTO records.

How This Patent Landscape Is Built

Patents are assigned to Information Storage based on their primary CPC classification (G11) as recorded by USPTO examiners. Total counts include all patents in the tracked dataset that carry this CPC prefix; recent-patent and yearly-trend tables are derived from the same record set. Each company\'s grade reflects its overall Patent Strength Score across its entire tracked portfolio, not just patents in this CPC class. Read the full methodology for the data pipeline, score weights, and known limitations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Information Storage CPC class?

Information Storage corresponds to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) prefix G11, the international system used by the USPTO and EPO to organize patents by technical subject matter. Patent landscape for Information Storage technology (CPC class G11). Covers innovations in information storage from leading companies worldwide. CPC classes are assigned by patent examiners and update as the technology evolves, so the patent set tracked here reflects the current classification of every included patent.

Who are the top patent holders in Information Storage?

IBM (108 patents), Microsoft (73 patents), Nvidia (48 patents), Intel (14 patents) are the leading holders in Information Storage. Patent counts at the company level are useful for spotting concentration, but they do not tell you about claim strength — for a finer signal, see each company's Patent Strength Score grade in the table below.

How many Information Storage patents will expire soon?

Per-year expiration counts for this technology class can be derived from the recent patents table on this page combined with each patent's expiration date — patents typically expire 20 years from earliest non-provisional filing. For year-by-year expiration totals across all CPC classes, see the expiring-year pages on this site, which break down each year's cohort by company and technology.

What happens when patents in Information Storage expire?

When a patent expires, its claims enter the public domain. For Information Storage, that means competitors can implement the underlying methods or apparatus without licensing fees. The practical impact varies — in regulated areas like pharmaceuticals, FDA-granted exclusivities can extend market protection past patent expiry. In unregulated technology areas, expiration usually translates directly into freedom-to-operate for new entrants.

Where does Information Storage patent data come from?

All patent data is sourced from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office through the PatentsView and Open Data Portal APIs. CPC classifications are assigned by USPTO examiners and are part of the official patent record. Verify any individual patent through USPTO Patent Public Search (ppubs.uspto.gov) or Google Patents.

All companies →Plain-English guides →Methodology →

Sources: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PatentsView, Open Data Portal). Public-domain federal data. Cite as: "PatentCliff, Information Storage landscape, April 2026. Data: USPTO."

Last updated 2026-04-10 · 243 patents tracked in Information Storage.