About PatentCliff
Which patents are about to expire?
What we do
PatentCliff tracks expiring U.S. patents so investors, generics manufacturers, and researchers can see the cliff coming.
We focus on U.S. patent filings, expirations, and patent cliffs. Every page on patentcliff.org is built from the USPTO PatentsView API, cited and linkable so readers can trace any number back to its source.
Who runs this
PatentCliff is built and maintained by the PatentCliff Team. We're a small group working on making public U.S. patent filings, expirations, and patent cliffs data easier for non-specialists to read. If you have a correction, a data tip, or a question about how a number was derived, the contact email below reaches us directly.
Who this is for
PatentCliff is built for pharma investors, generics teams, R&D strategists, and patent attorneys.
Why this exists
Public data on U.S. patent filings, expirations, and patent cliffs is technically free, but practically locked behind file formats, acronyms, and paywalled dashboards. PatentCliffexists to close that gap: take the raw federal and public-sector data, and turn it into pages a normal person can read in thirty seconds.
How we work
- Primary source only. We pull from the USPTO PatentsView API and cite the exact dataset and version on every page.
- No invented numbers. If a figure is not in the underlying public data, it does not appear on patentcliff.org. We never generate synthetic statistics to fill gaps.
- Methodology, in plain English. We pull USPTO PatentsView data for granted patents, compute expected expiration from grant date plus term-adjustment days, and flag patents expiring within the next 18 months. Citation counts and assignee rollups are derived from the PatentsView relationships.
- Refreshed on a schedule. Refreshed monthly when USPTO posts the PatentsView update.
- Corrections welcome. Readers flag issues all the time. When the source fixes a record, PatentCliff follows.
Known limitations
Expected expirations do not account for paid maintenance-fee lapses, which terminate a patent early — we cross-check the USPTO fee database where available but some lapses lag. Continuation and divisional families can extend effective protection past the parent’s expiration.
Why pharmaceutical patent data deserves a public-facing home
The FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records together constitute the public record of every U.S. pharmaceutical patent. The data covers brand-name drug patents, the expiration dates that drive generic-launch timing, and the patent challenges that can shift the timeline. This information is publicly available across two federal systems with very different presentation conventions; assembling the patent picture for a specific drug or company requires cross-referencing both, which is more friction than most users are willing to accept.
PatentCliff consolidates the picture. Every drug page shows the active patents, the projected expiration dates, and the generic-launch timeline. Every company page rolls up the patent portfolio. Every grade page groups drugs by the time horizon until patent expiration. The data is what the federal government already publishes; the value the site adds is the cross-reference between the Orange Book and the USPTO record.
How the pipeline pulls FDA and USPTO data
The FDA Orange Book pulls run quarterly when FDA publishes the updated Orange Book file. USPTO pulls run continuously to capture new patent grants and challenges. Each drug record is cross-referenced between the two sources to produce the patent-expiration timeline shown on the per-drug pages.
A practical detail: the patent-expiration date is the earliest unencumbered date for generic launch under current patent law, but real-world generic launches depend on additional factors — patent challenges, paragraph IV certifications, and FDA approval of the generic application. The expiration date is a necessary but not sufficient condition for generic entry; the pages flag drugs with known patent challenges.
Where pharmaceutical patent data has caveats
Three caveats. First, the Orange Book lists patents that the brand-name manufacturer has identified as covering the drug. Other patents may exist — process patents, formulation patents — that are not in the Orange Book but can still affect generic-launch timing. For full patent due diligence, the Orange Book is the starting point, not the comprehensive list.
Second, biologic drugs follow a different exclusivity regime (the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) rather than the Orange Book / Hatch-Waxman framework that covers small-molecule drugs. The site focuses on small-molecule drugs; the biologics calendar is a separate analysis.
Third, generic-launch timing depends on FDA approval of the specific generic application, which has its own queue and review timeline. Patent expiration sets the earliest possible launch date; the actual launch can lag by months or years on the generic manufacturer’s filing schedule, and the FDA’s queue depth for the specific generic application. Every page on the site links back to the originating federal dataset for verification; readers using the data for decisions should always cross-reference the most recent source release rather than treating any site value as the final word. Federal data products are continuously revised, and the live source is always the right reference for time-sensitive decisions. The methodology page on this site documents every dataset, every refresh cadence, and every limitation in detail so readers can trace any numeric value on the site back to the underlying federal source. We treat that traceability as a hard requirement for any data product that asks readers to make real-world decisions on its output. depending on the generic manufacturer’s filing schedule.
Independence
PatentCliff is an independent publication. We are not funded, owned, or directed by any of the agencies, companies, or organizations that appear in our data. Hosting is paid for by advertising — see our Privacy Policy for details — and we do not take paid placements, sponsored rankings, or "remove-my-entry" fees.
History
PatentCliff launched in 2026 as part of a small portfolio of independent public-data sites. It has been maintained and updated continuously since.
Contact
Tips, corrections, data-partnership questions, and press inquiries: hello@patentalert.org. More options on our contact page.