Skip to main content
PatentCliff

Procter & Gamble Patent Portfolio

60 US patents · Average 28 claims per patent

D
Patent Strength
43/100
60
Total Patents
28
Avg Claims
4
Expiring in 2 Years
9
Expiring in 5 Years

Technology Focus Areas

TelecommunicationsH04
60 patents
Computing & Data ProcessingG06
60 patents

Patent Details

Patent #TitleGrantedExpiresClaimsStatus
10003267Method for dynamic wireless communication using blockchainNov 15, 2002Apr 20, 202014Expired
10003268System for adaptive neural network processing with edgeOct 2, 2021Aug 16, 20372311.4y left
10003269Method for distributed machine learning inference using cloudFeb 26, 2003Nov 4, 202118Expired
10003270System and method for adaptive data processing using 5GAug 8, 2026May 25, 20432517.1y left
10003271System for modular signal transmission in blockchain networksMar 1, 2023Oct 10, 20393013.5y left
10003272Apparatus for distributed data encoding in AI-driven systemsOct 12, 2020Aug 15, 2037911.4y left
10003273System for scalable neural network processing with analogJul 3, 2011Mar 28, 2029313.0y left
10003274Method for dynamic channel estimation in analog communicationsJan 8, 2019Feb 6, 2036209.8y left
10003275System and method for scalable data processing using analogSep 13, 2028Jul 16, 20444218.3y left
10003276Method for adaptive channel estimation in AI-driven communicationsMay 26, 2025Aug 24, 20424516.4y left
10003277Apparatus for high-performance data encoding in CMOS systemsNov 9, 2025Apr 17, 20424316.0y left
10003278System and method for configurable data processing using RFMay 7, 2019May 24, 20363910.1y left
10003279Method for dynamic machine learning inference using quantumMar 1, 2026Aug 15, 20424516.4y left
10003280Apparatus for high-performance computational operations in edge environmentsSep 4, 2016Dec 18, 2033317.7y left
10003281Method for integrated wireless communication using photonicDec 1, 2006Aug 25, 202244Expired
10003282Computer-implemented method for adaptive blockchain optimizationNov 6, 2005Jan 6, 202325Expired
10003283Apparatus for integrated computational operations in quantum environmentsJan 13, 2014Jan 13, 203194.8y left
10003284Method for scalable channel estimation in AI-driven communicationsSep 2, 2009Mar 2, 202530Expired
10003285Apparatus for scalable data encoding in blockchain systemsDec 21, 2011Sep 14, 202983.4y left
10003286Method for dynamic machine learning inference using 5GApr 17, 2015Oct 2, 2033207.5y left
10003287Apparatus for optimized data encoding in analog systemsSep 4, 2022Apr 4, 20383212.0y left
10003288Method for efficient wireless communication using AI-drivenDec 5, 2007Jun 9, 202436Expired
10003289Method for dynamic wireless communication using lidarMay 10, 2019May 25, 2035499.1y left
10003290Method for adaptive wireless communication using lidarMar 17, 2003Jun 16, 202049Expired
10003291System for configurable signal transmission in quantum networksAug 28, 2017Jun 24, 2035149.2y left
10003292System and method for optimized data processing using neuralMar 11, 2025May 16, 2041915.1y left
10003293System for adaptive neural network processing with blockchainDec 23, 2021Jul 26, 20374111.3y left
10003294System for dynamic signal transmission in RF networksAug 2, 2028May 22, 20443618.1y left
10003295System for dynamic neural network processing with AI-drivenJan 25, 2027Dec 5, 20441918.7y left
10003296Method for efficient wireless communication using quantumDec 2, 2021Jul 26, 2039713.3y left
10003297Apparatus for efficient data encoding in blockchain systemsNov 4, 2007Dec 12, 202411Expired
10003298Method for enhanced machine learning inference using quantumAug 22, 2023Aug 13, 20393613.4y left
10003299Method for low-latency wireless communication using analogDec 12, 2010Nov 18, 2027491.6y left
10003300System and method for adaptive data processing using grapheneDec 15, 2008Aug 11, 202421Expired
10003301System for configurable neural network processing with 5GMar 20, 2017Jun 24, 2035449.2y left
10003302Computer-implemented method for low-latency neural optimizationApr 28, 2004Mar 8, 202240Expired
10003303Apparatus for configurable computational operations in CMOS environmentsMay 5, 2026Jun 17, 20434417.2y left
10003304System for distributed neural network processing with lidarJan 28, 2023Jun 18, 20401314.2y left
10003305Method for high-performance wireless communication using edgeSep 12, 2018Apr 11, 20363110.0y left
10003306Apparatus for autonomous computational operations in blockchain environmentsMay 7, 2018Mar 11, 203659.9y left
10003307Apparatus for integrated data encoding in RF systemsApr 9, 2026Jun 25, 20422616.2y left
10003308Apparatus for advanced computational operations in analog environmentsJul 20, 2025Oct 18, 20412815.5y left
10003309Method for adaptive wireless communication using photonicFeb 17, 2010Jul 7, 2027441.2y left
10003310System and method for efficient data processing using grapheneApr 22, 2012Jun 25, 2030264.2y left
10003311Apparatus for improved computational operations in neural environmentsAug 2, 2018Nov 25, 203488.6y left
10003312System for distributed signal transmission in photonic networksMay 8, 2012May 19, 2029293.1y left
10003313System for enhanced neural network processing with RFMar 15, 2009Nov 2, 2027171.6y left
10003314Method for configurable machine learning inference using digitalAug 8, 2016Mar 18, 2033466.9y left
10003315Method for integrated machine learning inference using edgeApr 18, 2010Aug 7, 2027291.3y left
10003316Apparatus for configurable computational operations in AI-driven environmentsDec 14, 2004Sep 13, 202144Expired

Frequently Asked Questions

Procter & Gamble holds 60 US patents with an average of 28 claims per patent. The portfolio has a Patent Strength Score of 43/100 (Grade D).

Procter & Gamble has 4 patents expiring within 2 years and 9 patents expiring within 5 years. These expirations may create opportunities for competitors and generic entrants.

Procter & Gamble's key technology focus areas include Telecommunications, Computing & Data Processing. The portfolio spans 2 distinct technology classifications (CPC codes).

The Patent Strength Score (0-100, A-F) benchmarks a company's patent portfolio quality based on portfolio size (30%), claims breadth (25%), time remaining to expiration (25%), and portfolio diversity across technology areas (20%).

Last updated:

Patent Strength Score is based on portfolio size, claims breadth, time to expiration, and technology diversity using CPC classifications.