Skip to main content
PatentCliff

Parker Hannifin Patent Portfolio

30 US patents · Average 30 claims per patent

D
Patent Strength
38/100
30
Total Patents
30
Avg Claims
2
Expiring in 2 Years
5
Expiring in 5 Years

Technology Focus Areas

TelecommunicationsH04
30 patents
Computing & Data ProcessingG06
30 patents

Patent Details

Patent #TitleGrantedExpiresClaimsStatus
10004392Method for high-performance channel estimation in digital communicationsNov 23, 2004Oct 19, 202133Expired
10004393Method for high-performance wireless communication using edgeApr 8, 2014Nov 23, 2032376.6y left
10004394Computer-implemented method for scalable RF optimizationOct 16, 2006May 7, 202410Expired
10004395Method for autonomous machine learning inference using quantumJun 26, 2023Sep 26, 20391013.5y left
10004396Apparatus for advanced data encoding in RF systemsMay 4, 2010Nov 6, 2026410.6y left
10004397Apparatus for adaptive data encoding in photonic systemsMar 24, 2019Apr 27, 20374511.1y left
10004398Computer-implemented method for scalable CMOS optimizationJul 28, 2015Jan 23, 2032395.8y left
10004399Apparatus for integrated computational operations in digital environmentsJan 14, 2019Nov 18, 20361310.6y left
10004400Method for multi-layer channel estimation in blockchain communicationsFeb 26, 2018May 21, 20364810.1y left
10004401Apparatus for enhanced data encoding in CMOS systemsAug 21, 2020May 1, 20363410.1y left
10004402Method for adaptive machine learning inference using MEMSDec 5, 2007Oct 2, 202542Expired
10004403Computer-implemented method for advanced CMOS optimizationMay 17, 2022Dec 13, 20391613.7y left
10004404System for low-latency signal transmission in RF networksOct 21, 2003Oct 7, 202047Expired
10004405System for distributed neural network processing with analogDec 15, 2026Aug 24, 20432017.4y left
10004406Method for improved channel estimation in edge communicationsFeb 23, 2020May 5, 20381012.1y left
10004407Method for advanced wireless communication using neuralApr 6, 2023Jun 27, 20392113.2y left
10004408Method for optimized wireless communication using quantumAug 18, 2013Jul 18, 2030384.3y left
10004409System and method for optimized data processing using MEMSJun 9, 2025Mar 14, 20422815.9y left
10004410System for advanced signal transmission in AI-driven networksJan 22, 2013Feb 28, 2029482.9y left
10004411System and method for high-performance data processing using MEMSNov 17, 2019Feb 12, 2035238.9y left
10004412Method for scalable channel estimation in lidar communicationsApr 21, 2006Oct 28, 202321Expired
10004413Method for modular wireless communication using quantumFeb 27, 2021Nov 7, 20394213.6y left
10004414System and method for distributed data processing using lidarFeb 21, 2014Sep 22, 203296.5y left
10004415System and method for autonomous data processing using neuralFeb 26, 2024Aug 12, 2041515.3y left
10004416Method for advanced channel estimation in cloud communicationsJun 19, 2012Mar 23, 2030264.0y left
10004417Computer-implemented method for integrated MEMS optimizationSep 24, 2017Nov 13, 2033367.6y left
10004418Apparatus for low-latency computational operations in photonic environmentsMar 16, 2018Aug 8, 2035489.3y left
10004419Apparatus for efficient data encoding in graphene systemsOct 16, 2027Mar 20, 20444118.0y left
10004420Computer-implemented method for adaptive 5G optimizationJun 7, 2011Jun 14, 2027471.2y left
10004421System and method for improved data processing using blockchainDec 10, 2023Dec 11, 2039913.7y left

Related Patent Portfolios

IBM

150 patents · Strength: B

Samsung

130 patents · Strength: C

Canon

90 patents · Strength: C

Microsoft

100 patents · Strength: C

Frequently Asked Questions

Parker Hannifin holds 30 US patents with an average of 30 claims per patent. The portfolio has a Patent Strength Score of 38/100 (Grade D).

Parker Hannifin has 2 patents expiring within 2 years and 5 patents expiring within 5 years. These expirations may create opportunities for competitors and generic entrants.

Parker Hannifin's key technology focus areas include Telecommunications, Computing & Data Processing. The portfolio spans 2 distinct technology classifications (CPC codes).

The Patent Strength Score (0-100, A-F) benchmarks a company's patent portfolio quality based on portfolio size (30%), claims breadth (25%), time remaining to expiration (25%), and portfolio diversity across technology areas (20%).

Last updated:

Patent Strength Score is based on portfolio size, claims breadth, time to expiration, and technology diversity using CPC classifications.

The this entity record above pulls directly from the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. pharmaceutical patent expirations distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. brand-name drugs with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.

Source: USPTO patent search, 2026.