Skip to main content
PatentCliff

L3Harris Patent Portfolio

30 US patents · Average 30 claims per patent

D
Patent Strength
40/100
30
Total Patents
30
Avg Claims
0
Expiring in 2 Years
0
Expiring in 5 Years

Technology Focus Areas

Computing & Data ProcessingG06
30 patents
TelecommunicationsH04
30 patents

Patent Details

Patent #TitleGrantedExpiresClaimsStatus
10004497System for integrated neural network processing with edgeJul 5, 2009Jul 16, 202517Expired
10004498Computer-implemented method for integrated digital optimizationJun 9, 2006May 2, 20247Expired
10004499Computer-implemented method for advanced CMOS optimizationJun 2, 2023Aug 18, 20404414.4y left
10004500System for improved signal transmission in RF networksMay 6, 2021Oct 1, 20394213.5y left
10004501System for advanced signal transmission in quantum networksJan 6, 2018Sep 18, 20362710.5y left
10004502System and method for dynamic data processing using quantumOct 9, 2022Feb 12, 20384211.9y left
10004503Method for optimized channel estimation in AI-driven communicationsJul 6, 2018Oct 6, 2035219.5y left
10004504Method for optimized wireless communication using nano-scaleApr 9, 2003May 2, 202032Expired
10004505System for low-latency signal transmission in RF networksApr 6, 2018Dec 27, 2035249.7y left
10004506Apparatus for modular data encoding in lidar systemsJun 3, 2005Aug 14, 202235Expired
10004507System for adaptive neural network processing with 5GJul 1, 2026Aug 9, 20433617.3y left
10004508Method for optimized channel estimation in quantum communicationsDec 5, 2026Oct 2, 20424716.5y left
10004509Apparatus for improved data encoding in nano-scale systemsMay 25, 2022Sep 4, 20404414.4y left
10004510System for autonomous neural network processing with photonicJul 20, 2026Oct 5, 20432517.5y left
10004511System and method for enhanced data processing using AI-drivenNov 14, 2025Jul 15, 20412715.3y left
10004512Apparatus for modular computational operations in digital environmentsJul 20, 2028Nov 7, 20444918.6y left
10004513Method for dynamic channel estimation in lidar communicationsMar 10, 2019Sep 10, 20361710.4y left
10004514Apparatus for high-performance computational operations in 5G environmentsJan 25, 2007Oct 17, 202433Expired
10004515System for optimized neural network processing with photonicDec 15, 2003Sep 15, 202113Expired
10004516System and method for adaptive data processing using lidarJan 18, 2017Feb 2, 2035368.8y left
10004517Apparatus for distributed data encoding in MEMS systemsAug 13, 2005Sep 10, 202344Expired
10004518Apparatus for modular computational operations in blockchain environmentsDec 24, 2021Feb 1, 20381511.8y left
10004519Apparatus for adaptive data encoding in blockchain systemsApr 18, 2020Jul 24, 20381212.3y left
10004520Apparatus for advanced computational operations in digital environmentsOct 26, 2018May 23, 20364810.1y left
10004521Method for autonomous machine learning inference using grapheneJul 20, 2019Oct 18, 20362510.5y left
10004522Method for improved channel estimation in nano-scale communicationsDec 4, 2020Mar 17, 2038811.9y left
10004523System and method for high-performance data processing using digitalNov 19, 2024Oct 18, 20412315.5y left
10004524Apparatus for modular computational operations in lidar environmentsFeb 23, 2019Sep 19, 20374811.5y left
10004525System for low-latency signal transmission in photonic networksFeb 18, 2021Apr 27, 20383512.1y left
10004526System for efficient neural network processing with lidarOct 23, 2007Mar 10, 202330Expired

Related Patent Portfolios

IBM

150 patents · Strength: B

Samsung

130 patents · Strength: C

Canon

90 patents · Strength: C

Microsoft

100 patents · Strength: C

Frequently Asked Questions

L3Harris holds 30 US patents with an average of 30 claims per patent. The portfolio has a Patent Strength Score of 40/100 (Grade D).

L3Harris has 0 patents expiring within 2 years and 0 patents expiring within 5 years. The portfolio has a healthy time horizon.

L3Harris's key technology focus areas include Computing & Data Processing, Telecommunications. The portfolio spans 2 distinct technology classifications (CPC codes).

The Patent Strength Score (0-100, A-F) benchmarks a company's patent portfolio quality based on portfolio size (30%), claims breadth (25%), time remaining to expiration (25%), and portfolio diversity across technology areas (20%).

Last updated:

Patent Strength Score is based on portfolio size, claims breadth, time to expiration, and technology diversity using CPC classifications.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. brand-name drugs. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.

Source: USPTO patent search, 2026.