Skip to main content
PatentCliff

Danaher Patent Portfolio

40 US patents · Average 30 claims per patent

D
Patent Strength
43/100
40
Total Patents
30
Avg Claims
0
Expiring in 2 Years
1
Expiring in 5 Years

Technology Focus Areas

TelecommunicationsH04
40 patents
Computing & Data ProcessingG06
40 patents

Patent Details

Patent #TitleGrantedExpiresClaimsStatus
10004985System for improved signal transmission in digital networksMar 4, 2027Sep 5, 20444518.4y left
10004986Apparatus for integrated computational operations in nano-scale environmentsOct 15, 2021Jun 8, 20384612.2y left
10004987Method for high-performance wireless communication using photonicSep 20, 2019Apr 15, 20373311.0y left
10004988Computer-implemented method for scalable photonic optimizationAug 2, 2006Dec 13, 202441Expired
10004989System and method for distributed data processing using neuralApr 11, 2019Dec 20, 203569.7y left
10004990Computer-implemented method for enhanced quantum optimizationOct 21, 2005Mar 14, 202329Expired
10004991Apparatus for modular computational operations in RF environmentsMar 23, 2005Mar 1, 202222Expired
10004992Method for optimized channel estimation in photonic communicationsOct 12, 2025Jan 4, 20423015.7y left
10004993Apparatus for modular data encoding in photonic systemsFeb 5, 2025Aug 3, 2043517.3y left
10004994Apparatus for integrated data encoding in CMOS systemsJan 19, 2022Dec 25, 2039713.7y left
10004995System and method for scalable data processing using cloudJan 6, 2015Dec 1, 2032446.7y left
10004996Method for distributed channel estimation in AI-driven communicationsNov 3, 2018Jun 19, 2035359.2y left
10004997Method for modular wireless communication using CMOSFeb 15, 2021Aug 3, 20394813.3y left
10004998System and method for dynamic data processing using quantumApr 7, 2025May 1, 20421916.1y left
10004999Method for configurable channel estimation in edge communicationsMar 24, 2016May 16, 2032336.1y left
10005000System and method for adaptive data processing using quantumAug 14, 2024Apr 8, 20402514.0y left
10005001Apparatus for efficient data encoding in CMOS systemsJun 15, 2023May 18, 20413815.1y left
10005002Method for high-performance wireless communication using RFMar 19, 2021Sep 23, 20372211.5y left
10005003Computer-implemented method for dynamic nano-scale optimizationJul 8, 2014Jan 1, 2031404.7y left
10005004System and method for low-latency data processing using AI-drivenMar 23, 2021Apr 5, 20394013.0y left
10005005Method for autonomous wireless communication using AI-drivenJan 25, 2023Oct 11, 20394613.5y left
10005006Computer-implemented method for modular edge optimizationMay 5, 2020Nov 10, 20374511.6y left
10005007Computer-implemented method for improved neural optimizationJul 9, 2024Jul 12, 20403814.3y left
10005008System for integrated signal transmission in CMOS networksJul 4, 2016Apr 23, 2034408.0y left
10005009Apparatus for advanced data encoding in digital systemsNov 23, 2004Feb 15, 202231Expired
10005010System for improved neural network processing with AI-drivenSep 3, 2027Sep 16, 20431217.4y left
10005011Method for advanced wireless communication using quantumDec 2, 2026Nov 21, 20423316.6y left
10005012Method for optimized machine learning inference using nano-scaleJan 6, 2008Jul 10, 202431Expired
10005013Method for scalable wireless communication using 5GOct 26, 2022Oct 25, 20391813.6y left
10005014Method for high-performance wireless communication using grapheneFeb 21, 2020May 25, 20371711.1y left
10005015Computer-implemented method for adaptive quantum optimizationJan 15, 2009Aug 8, 202540Expired
10005016Method for configurable wireless communication using lidarOct 12, 2020Dec 24, 20382512.7y left
10005017System for multi-layer neural network processing with grapheneJul 21, 2022Jun 19, 20402814.2y left
10005018Method for configurable wireless communication using MEMSDec 17, 2025Dec 16, 20413015.7y left
10005019System for low-latency signal transmission in edge networksAug 8, 2004Jan 27, 202218Expired
10005020Method for autonomous wireless communication using CMOSJul 27, 2027Jun 6, 20441318.2y left
10005021Computer-implemented method for integrated MEMS optimizationJan 18, 2007Oct 2, 202426Expired
10005022System and method for low-latency data processing using quantumJul 1, 2027Dec 22, 20434917.7y left
10005023Method for efficient machine learning inference using quantumFeb 18, 2017Mar 10, 2033126.9y left
10005024Apparatus for adaptive computational operations in cloud environmentsJun 21, 2023Nov 8, 20392413.6y left

Related Patent Portfolios

IBM

150 patents · Strength: B

Samsung

130 patents · Strength: C

Canon

90 patents · Strength: C

Microsoft

100 patents · Strength: C

Frequently Asked Questions

Danaher holds 40 US patents with an average of 30 claims per patent. The portfolio has a Patent Strength Score of 43/100 (Grade D).

Danaher has 0 patents expiring within 2 years and 1 patents expiring within 5 years. The portfolio has a healthy time horizon.

Danaher's key technology focus areas include Telecommunications, Computing & Data Processing. The portfolio spans 2 distinct technology classifications (CPC codes).

The Patent Strength Score (0-100, A-F) benchmarks a company's patent portfolio quality based on portfolio size (30%), claims breadth (25%), time remaining to expiration (25%), and portfolio diversity across technology areas (20%).

Last updated:

Patent Strength Score is based on portfolio size, claims breadth, time to expiration, and technology diversity using CPC classifications.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. brand-name drugs with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.

Source: USPTO patent search, 2026.