Skip to main content
PatentCliff

Bio-Rad Patent Portfolio

30 US patents · Average 26 claims per patent

D
Patent Strength
40/100
30
Total Patents
26
Avg Claims
0
Expiring in 2 Years
3
Expiring in 5 Years

Technology Focus Areas

TelecommunicationsH04
30 patents
Computing & Data ProcessingG06
30 patents

Patent Details

Patent #TitleGrantedExpiresClaimsStatus
10005105Apparatus for optimized data encoding in digital systemsJan 19, 2028Feb 14, 20442217.9y left
10005106Apparatus for efficient data encoding in AI-driven systemsSep 13, 2015Jan 18, 2031404.8y left
10005107System for distributed neural network processing with nano-scaleMar 20, 2006Sep 28, 202230Expired
10005108System and method for configurable data processing using 5GAug 9, 2019Aug 6, 20372211.3y left
10005109Apparatus for modular computational operations in quantum environmentsJan 10, 2022Jan 8, 20403013.8y left
10005110Method for distributed wireless communication using cloudSep 24, 2025Aug 22, 20433817.4y left
10005111Method for high-performance wireless communication using MEMSDec 21, 2027Apr 12, 20443318.0y left
10005112Method for scalable channel estimation in analog communicationsJul 19, 2014Dec 4, 2031425.7y left
10005113Apparatus for integrated data encoding in photonic systemsMar 12, 2024Aug 11, 20413215.3y left
10005114Apparatus for distributed data encoding in edge systemsNov 18, 2025Dec 3, 20432117.7y left
10005115Apparatus for distributed data encoding in edge systemsJan 21, 2019Jul 26, 20371511.3y left
10005116System for enhanced neural network processing with neuralOct 22, 2021Sep 21, 20374511.5y left
10005117System and method for efficient data processing using analogSep 3, 2021Oct 3, 20381212.5y left
10005118Apparatus for autonomous computational operations in photonic environmentsSep 3, 2008Feb 20, 20245Expired
10005119Method for dynamic channel estimation in quantum communicationsSep 19, 2014Mar 18, 203285.9y left
10005120Method for enhanced channel estimation in nano-scale communicationsOct 23, 2028Sep 7, 20444818.4y left
10005121Method for low-latency wireless communication using lidarJul 16, 2024Apr 5, 2041715.0y left
10005122Apparatus for improved computational operations in graphene environmentsFeb 4, 2008Aug 11, 202529Expired
10005123Apparatus for configurable computational operations in MEMS environmentsJan 12, 2010Jun 16, 2028242.2y left
10005124Apparatus for high-performance data encoding in 5G systemsMay 1, 2025Sep 3, 20433817.4y left
10005125Method for scalable channel estimation in analog communicationsFeb 13, 2024Nov 15, 20423716.6y left
10005126System for optimized neural network processing with CMOSJan 23, 2022Apr 14, 20401614.0y left
10005127System for efficient neural network processing with blockchainOct 26, 2013Oct 24, 2030144.5y left
10005128Method for distributed wireless communication using nano-scaleFeb 19, 2022Jun 5, 20402614.2y left
10005129Apparatus for autonomous computational operations in AI-driven environmentsNov 13, 2025Feb 7, 20434416.8y left
10005130Method for scalable wireless communication using RFApr 7, 2003Jan 7, 202012Expired
10005131System and method for improved data processing using lidarApr 13, 2027Dec 11, 2043617.7y left
10005132Method for advanced wireless communication using 5GMay 19, 2023Aug 17, 20392413.4y left
10005133Method for enhanced channel estimation in nano-scale communicationsJul 6, 2015Aug 27, 2031415.4y left
10005134Apparatus for enhanced data encoding in photonic systemsSep 3, 2026Dec 18, 20441018.7y left

Related Patent Portfolios

IBM

150 patents · Strength: B

Samsung

130 patents · Strength: C

Canon

90 patents · Strength: C

Microsoft

100 patents · Strength: C

Frequently Asked Questions

Bio-Rad holds 30 US patents with an average of 26 claims per patent. The portfolio has a Patent Strength Score of 40/100 (Grade D).

Bio-Rad has 0 patents expiring within 2 years and 3 patents expiring within 5 years. The portfolio has a healthy time horizon.

Bio-Rad's key technology focus areas include Telecommunications, Computing & Data Processing. The portfolio spans 2 distinct technology classifications (CPC codes).

The Patent Strength Score (0-100, A-F) benchmarks a company's patent portfolio quality based on portfolio size (30%), claims breadth (25%), time remaining to expiration (25%), and portfolio diversity across technology areas (20%).

Last updated:

Patent Strength Score is based on portfolio size, claims breadth, time to expiration, and technology diversity using CPC classifications.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. brand-name drugs with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.

Source: USPTO patent search, 2026.