Skip to main content
PatentCliff

Updated April 2026 · USPTO PatentsView

When Does Pomalyst Patent Expire?

Pomalyst is protected by 8 US patents in the USPTO records tracked here. The earliest patent expires on Jun 22, 2026 (0.1 years from now), opening the door to potential generic or biosimilar competition for that specific composition. Full portfolio protection extends to Jan 1, 2040. Overall Patent Strength Score: 31/100 (Grade F, "very weak").

Pomalyst Patent Snapshot

Total US Patents8
Earliest Patent ExpirationJun 22, 2026
Latest Patent ExpirationJan 1, 2040
Years Until First Expiry0.1 yr
Patent HolderCelgene Corporation
Generic Namepomalyst
Patent Strength ScoreF31/100

When the Pomalyst Patent Cliff Hits

Pomalyst is at the front edge of its patent cliff. The earliest expiration falls in 2026 — under two years from today — which is the conventional window in which generic manufacturers file Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) and biosimilar developers begin commercial planning. Full portfolio coverage extends to 2040, a 14-year tail that typically drives litigation over secondary patents.

Because Pomalyst's patent cliff is within three years, generic manufacturers are likely already preparing ANDA filings or have filed Paragraph IV certifications. Under Hatch-Waxman, the first successful Paragraph IV challenger earns a 180-day exclusivity period as the sole generic. Watch FDA's Paragraph IV certification list for filing activity tied to Pomalyst.

For the authoritative listing of patents tied to a specific drug — the patents an ANDA filer is legally required to address under 21 USC § 355(j) — consult the FDA Orange Book. Underlying utility patent data on this page is sourced from USPTO PatentsView, the federal government's free public patent API.

Inside the Pomalyst Patent Portfolio

Pomalyst is protected by 8 US patents, a mid-sized portfolio that is typical for an established branded drug in mid-lifecycle. The portfolio likely combines a primary composition-of-matter patent (the strongest form of protection) with a layer of formulation, dosing, and method-of-use patents that extend exclusivity beyond the original composition expiry — a common strategy known as "patent layering" or, less charitably, "evergreening."

All 8 patents in the Pomalyst portfolio are assigned to Celgene Corporation, indicating consolidated ownership. Single-assignee portfolios are simpler to litigate and easier to license — generic challengers face one negotiating counterparty, and any settlement or pay-for-delay arrangement involves only that holder.

The Pomalyst portfolio scores 31/100 (Grade F, "very weak") on the PatentCliff Strength index. The strongest signal is claims breadth (67/100), and the weakest is technology diversity (10/100). The four factors are weighted by how well they predict real-world resilience to generic challenge: portfolio size 30%, claims breadth 25%, time remaining 25%, and technology diversity 20%.

Earliest Patents in the Portfolio

Patent #TitleExpiresYears Left
10005695high-performance chemical composition with quantum propertie…20260.2
10005693Pharmaceutical composition comprising dynamic edge compounds20271.5
10005688optimized chemical composition with blockchain properties20282.4
10005691Method for preparing improved CMOS derivatives20303.9
10005689Novel advanced nano-scale compound and synthesis thereof20315.0
10005692Novel efficient edge compound and synthesis thereof20326.2
10005690low-latency chemical composition with AI-driven properties20347.9
10005694Medical device for adaptive graphene delivery204013.7

Pomalyst vs Other Branded Drugs

Pomalyst's 8-patent portfolio is 36% smaller than the average drug tracked here (12 patents) — lighter-than-typical lifecycle protection. Among the 40 drugs in this database, Pomalyst ranks #33 by patent count. For broader context, the earliest expiration in the data set is Biktarvy (2025) and the longest-protected drug is Wegovy (latest expiry 2040).

Expiration Timeline

Looking at the 8 dated patents in the portfolio, the largest cluster (2 patents) falls in the "Within 2 years (by 2028)" bucket. That distribution matters because generic entry is gated by the latest unexpired blocking patent, not the earliest — even one late-expiring formulation patent can delay biosimilar launch by years if it survives a Paragraph IV challenge.

The 20-year patent term in the United States runs from the earliest non-provisional filing date, not the grant date. That means a patent granted in 2015 from a 2010 filing has only 15 years of life left at grant — a feature of US patent law that creates the layered "cliff" pattern visible in most branded drug portfolios. Patent Term Extension under 35 USC § 156 can add up to 5 years for time lost to FDA review, and pediatric exclusivity can add 6 months on top.

How the Patent Strength Score Is Calculated

The PatentCliff Strength Score combines four signals from USPTO data into a single 0-100 grade. Portfolio size (30%) measures the number of patents covering the drug — a proxy for litigation depth and the count of independent challenges a generic must clear. Claims breadth (25%) is the average number of claims per patent, an indicator of how broadly each patent attempts to cover the underlying invention. Time remaining (25%) measures average years until expiration across the portfolio. Technology diversity (20%) measures the number of distinct CPC (Cooperative Patent Classification) classes the portfolio touches — diverse portfolios are harder to design around. Read the full PatentCliff methodology, including how scores compare to citation-weighted academic measures.

Sources: Patent records — USPTO PatentsView API (public domain). Drug-to-patent mapping cross-referenced against the FDA Orange Book. Expiration dates calculated as application date plus 20 years per 35 USC § 154.

Cite as: "PatentCliff, April 2026 reading. Source: USPTO PatentsView." Last updated 2026-04-10.

The data source behind this answer is the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records. Every figure on the page traces back to that source; the methodology page describes the inputs and the refresh cadence in full detail.

For readers turning this answer into action: cross-reference against the underlying the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records record before acting on time-sensitive decisions. The site renders the data as it was published; subsequent revisions can shift the picture, and the live federal data is always the authoritative current reference.