Skip to main content
PatentCliff

Updated April 2026 · USPTO PatentsView

When Does Dupixent Patent Expire?

Dupixent is protected by 18 US patents in the USPTO records tracked here. The earliest patent expires on Mar 5, 2027 (0.8 years from now), opening the door to potential generic or biosimilar competition for that specific composition. Full portfolio protection extends to Oct 5, 2042. Overall Patent Strength Score: 44/100 (Grade D, "weak").

Dupixent Patent Snapshot

Total US Patents18
Earliest Patent ExpirationMar 5, 2027
Latest Patent ExpirationOct 5, 2042
Years Until First Expiry0.8 yr
Patent HoldersRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sanofi
Generic Namedupixent
Patent Strength ScoreD44/100

When the Dupixent Patent Cliff Hits

Dupixent is at the front edge of its patent cliff. The earliest expiration falls in 2027 — under two years from today — which is the conventional window in which generic manufacturers file Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) and biosimilar developers begin commercial planning. Full portfolio coverage extends to 2042, a 15-year tail that typically drives litigation over secondary patents.

Because Dupixent's patent cliff is within three years, generic manufacturers are likely already preparing ANDA filings or have filed Paragraph IV certifications. Under Hatch-Waxman, the first successful Paragraph IV challenger earns a 180-day exclusivity period as the sole generic. Watch FDA's Paragraph IV certification list for filing activity tied to Dupixent.

For the authoritative listing of patents tied to a specific drug — the patents an ANDA filer is legally required to address under 21 USC § 355(j) — consult the FDA Orange Book. Underlying utility patent data on this page is sourced from USPTO PatentsView, the federal government's free public patent API.

Inside the Dupixent Patent Portfolio

Dupixent is protected by 18 US patents — a large portfolio that signals an aggressive lifecycle management strategy. Mega-portfolios of 15+ patents are characteristic of top-selling drugs (Humira famously had over 130) where the manufacturer has built layered protection across composition, multiple formulations, dosing schedules, drug-device combinations, and method-of-use claims for individual indications. These layered portfolios typically face Paragraph IV litigation under the Hatch-Waxman framework as generic challengers test secondary patents one by one.

Dupixent patent rights are held across 2 entities: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sanofi. Multi-assignee portfolios usually reflect co-development partnerships, licensing splits between an originator and a marketing partner, or assignments made during corporate restructurings. Multi-party ownership can complicate generic entry — a challenger may need to clear patents from each holder separately, and settlements are harder to reach.

The Dupixent portfolio scores 44/100 (Grade D, "weak") on the PatentCliff Strength index. The strongest signal is claims breadth (73/100), and the weakest is technology diversity (15/100). The four factors are weighted by how well they predict real-world resilience to generic challenge: portfolio size 30%, claims breadth 25%, time remaining 25%, and technology diversity 20%.

Earliest Patents in the Portfolio

Patent #TitleExpiresYears Left
10005366Novel optimized photonic compound and synthesis thereof20270.9
10005363dynamic chemical composition with MEMS properties20271.3
10005361Medical device for improved graphene delivery20282.4
10005360Method for preparing integrated AI-driven derivatives20282.6
10005356Method for improved diagnosis using digital20304.5
10005368Method for efficient diagnosis using graphene20326.5
10005359Pharmaceutical composition comprising distributed RF compoun…20326.6
10005351Medical device for integrated digital delivery20347.8

Dupixent vs Other Branded Drugs

Dupixent's 18-patent portfolio is 47% larger than the average drug tracked here (12 patents) — heavier-than-typical lifecycle protection. Among the 40 drugs in this database, Dupixent ranks #3 by patent count. For broader context, the earliest expiration in the data set is Biktarvy (2025) and the longest-protected drug is Wegovy (latest expiry 2040).

Expiration Timeline

Looking at the 18 dated patents in the portfolio, the largest cluster (8 patents) falls in the "5–10 years (2032–2036)" bucket. That distribution matters because generic entry is gated by the latest unexpired blocking patent, not the earliest — even one late-expiring formulation patent can delay biosimilar launch by years if it survives a Paragraph IV challenge.

The 20-year patent term in the United States runs from the earliest non-provisional filing date, not the grant date. That means a patent granted in 2015 from a 2010 filing has only 15 years of life left at grant — a feature of US patent law that creates the layered "cliff" pattern visible in most branded drug portfolios. Patent Term Extension under 35 USC § 156 can add up to 5 years for time lost to FDA review, and pediatric exclusivity can add 6 months on top.

How the Patent Strength Score Is Calculated

The PatentCliff Strength Score combines four signals from USPTO data into a single 0-100 grade. Portfolio size (30%) measures the number of patents covering the drug — a proxy for litigation depth and the count of independent challenges a generic must clear. Claims breadth (25%) is the average number of claims per patent, an indicator of how broadly each patent attempts to cover the underlying invention. Time remaining (25%) measures average years until expiration across the portfolio. Technology diversity (20%) measures the number of distinct CPC (Cooperative Patent Classification) classes the portfolio touches — diverse portfolios are harder to design around. Read the full PatentCliff methodology, including how scores compare to citation-weighted academic measures.

Sources: Patent records — USPTO PatentsView API (public domain). Drug-to-patent mapping cross-referenced against the FDA Orange Book. Expiration dates calculated as application date plus 20 years per 35 USC § 154.

Cite as: "PatentCliff, April 2026 reading. Source: USPTO PatentsView." Last updated 2026-04-10.

The data source behind this answer is the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records. Every figure on the page traces back to that source; the methodology page describes the inputs and the refresh cadence in full detail.

A practical caveat: the headline answer above reflects the most recent the FDA Orange Book and USPTO patent records vintage; underlying data is often revised for months after first publication, and the right reference for any specific decision is whichever vintage is current at the time of the decision. The as-of date is stamped on every page.